[jira] [Commented] (SYNCOPE-1067) More flexible delegated administration model

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[jira] [Commented] (SYNCOPE-1067) More flexible delegated administration model

JIRA jira@apache.org

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-1067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16044752#comment-16044752 ]

ASF subversion and git services commented on SYNCOPE-1067:
----------------------------------------------------------

Commit 23b1c9d76840fe0331edabbdcda239f477294181 in syncope's branch refs/heads/master from [~ilgrosso]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=syncope.git;h=23b1c9d ]

[SYNCOPE-1067] Fix build (2nd attempt)


> More flexible delegated administration model
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SYNCOPE-1067
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-1067
>             Project: Syncope
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: console, core
>            Reporter: Francesco Chicchiriccò
>            Assignee: Francesco Chicchiriccò
>             Fix For: 2.0.4, 2.1.0
>
>
> The current implementation of [delegated administration|https://syncope.apache.org/docs/reference-guide.html#delegated-administration] relies on Roles, where each Role associates a set of Entitlements (e.g. administrative actions) to a set of Realms (e.g. containers for Users / Groups / Any Objects).
> This requires, however, that the set of Users / Groups / Any Objects to administer is somehow statically defined by containment: "administrators with role R can manage users under realms /a and /b" works as long as users to administer are fully contained by the Realms /a and /b; but what if the set of Users that R can administer needs to be dynamically defined, say by the value of a 'department' attribute?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)