[DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.6?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.6?

ilgrosso
Administrator
Hi all,
it seems that Syncope 2.0.6 is at a point where the issues left [1] are
either new features that can be safely moved to 2.0.7 (or 2.0.8, or even
2.1.0) or minor issues which seem not to have an easy or effective fix
immediately available.

 From the other side, instead, several bugs have been already fixed [2],
some of them quite relevant.

What about releasing 2.0.6 anytime soon? I don't see many reasons to
wait for more.

Regards.

[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20new%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20done%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC

--
Francesco Chicchiriccò

Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/

Member at The Apache Software Foundation
Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.6?

Fabio Martelli
Il 05/10/2017 08:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:

> Hi all,
> it seems that Syncope 2.0.6 is at a point where the issues left [1]
> are either new features that can be safely moved to 2.0.7 (or 2.0.8,
> or even 2.1.0) or minor issues which seem not to have an easy or
> effective fix immediately available.
>
> From the other side, instead, several bugs have been already fixed
> [2], some of them quite relevant.
>
> What about releasing 2.0.6 anytime soon? I don't see many reasons to
> wait for more.
>
> Regards.
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20new%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
> [2]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20done%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
>
+1

Regards,

F.

--
Fabio Martelli
https://it.linkedin.com/pub/fabio-martelli/1/974/a44
http://blog.tirasa.net/author/fabio/index.html

Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/index.html?pk_campaign=email&pk_kwd=fm

Apache Syncope PMC
http://people.apache.org/~fmartelli/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.6?

Andrea Patricelli-2
In reply to this post by ilgrosso
+1 also for me.

Best regards,
Andrea


Il 05/10/2017 08:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:

> Hi all,
> it seems that Syncope 2.0.6 is at a point where the issues left [1]
> are either new features that can be safely moved to 2.0.7 (or 2.0.8,
> or even 2.1.0) or minor issues which seem not to have an easy or
> effective fix immediately available.
>
> From the other side, instead, several bugs have been already fixed
> [2], some of them quite relevant.
>
> What about releasing 2.0.6 anytime soon? I don't see many reasons to
> wait for more.
>
> Regards.
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20new%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
> [2]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20done%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
>
--
Dott. Andrea Patricelli
Tel. +39 3204524292

Developer @ Tirasa S.r.l.
Viale D'Annunzio 267 - 65127 Pescara
Tel +39 0859116307 / FAX +39 0859111173
http://www.tirasa.net

Apache Syncope PMC Member

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.6?

Matteo Di Carlo
In reply to this post by Fabio Martelli
Actually most of them are new features, so I agree.

Matteo


On 05/10/2017 09:06, Fabio Martelli wrote:

> Il 05/10/2017 08:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
>> Hi all,
>> it seems that Syncope 2.0.6 is at a point where the issues left [1]
>> are either new features that can be safely moved to 2.0.7 (or 2.0.8,
>> or even 2.1.0) or minor issues which seem not to have an easy or
>> effective fix immediately available.
>>
>> From the other side, instead, several bugs have been already fixed
>> [2], some of them quite relevant.
>>
>> What about releasing 2.0.6 anytime soon? I don't see many reasons to
>> wait for more.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20new%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
>> [2]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20done%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
>>
> +1
>
> Regards,
>
> F.
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.6?

Tirasa
In reply to this post by ilgrosso
+1 for me!

Regards,

Matteo Alessandroni

On 05/10/2017 08:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:

> Hi all,
> it seems that Syncope 2.0.6 is at a point where the issues left [1]
> are either new features that can be safely moved to 2.0.7 (or 2.0.8,
> or even 2.1.0) or minor issues which seem not to have an easy or
> effective fix immediately available.
>
> From the other side, instead, several bugs have been already fixed
> [2], some of them quite relevant.
>
> What about releasing 2.0.6 anytime soon? I don't see many reasons to
> wait for more.
>
> Regards.
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20new%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
> [2]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20done%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.6?

Marco Di Sabatino Di Diodoro-2
In reply to this post by ilgrosso


Il 05/10/2017 08:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:

> Hi all,
> it seems that Syncope 2.0.6 is at a point where the issues left [1]
> are either new features that can be safely moved to 2.0.7 (or 2.0.8,
> or even 2.1.0) or minor issues which seem not to have an easy or
> effective fix immediately available.
>
> From the other side, instead, several bugs have been already fixed
> [2], some of them quite relevant.
>
> What about releasing 2.0.6 anytime soon? I don't see many reasons to
> wait for more.
>
> Regards.
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20new%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
> [2]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20done%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
>
+1

BR
Marco

--
Dott. Marco Di Sabatino Di Diodoro
Tel. +39 3939065570

Tirasa S.r.l.
Viale D'Annunzio 267 - 65127 Pescara
Tel +39 0859116307 / FAX +39 0859111173
http://www.tirasa.net

Apache Syncope PMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~mdisabatino/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.6?

Massimiliano Perrone (tirasa.net)
In reply to this post by ilgrosso


Il 05/10/2017 08:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:

> Hi all,
> it seems that Syncope 2.0.6 is at a point where the issues left [1]
> are either new features that can be safely moved to 2.0.7 (or 2.0.8,
> or even 2.1.0) or minor issues which seem not to have an easy or
> effective fix immediately available.
>
> From the other side, instead, several bugs have been already fixed
> [2], some of them quite relevant.
>
> What about releasing 2.0.6 anytime soon? I don't see many reasons to
> wait for more.
>
> Regards.
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20new%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
> [2]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20done%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
>
+1

Massi

--
Massimiliano Perrone
Tel +39 393 9121310
Tirasa S.r.l.
http://www.tirasa.net
"L'apprendere molte cose non insegna l'intelligenza"
(Eraclito)

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.6?

Lorenzo
In reply to this post by ilgrosso
+1.

Regards,

Lorenzo Di Cola


Il 05/10/2017 08:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:

> Hi all,
> it seems that Syncope 2.0.6 is at a point where the issues left [1]
> are either new features that can be safely moved to 2.0.7 (or 2.0.8,
> or even 2.1.0) or minor issues which seem not to have an easy or
> effective fix immediately available.
>
> From the other side, instead, several bugs have been already fixed
> [2], some of them quite relevant.
>
> What about releasing 2.0.6 anytime soon? I don't see many reasons to
> wait for more.
>
> Regards.
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20new%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
> [2]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20=%20done%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.6?

Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1.

Colm.

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Lorenzo Di Cola <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> +1.
>
> Regards,
>
> Lorenzo Di Cola
>
>
> Il 05/10/2017 08:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
>
>> Hi all,
>> it seems that Syncope 2.0.6 is at a point where the issues left [1] are
>> either new features that can be safely moved to 2.0.7 (or 2.0.8, or even
>> 2.1.0) or minor issues which seem not to have an easy or effective fix
>> immediately available.
>>
>> From the other side, instead, several bugs have been already fixed [2],
>> some of them quite relevant.
>>
>> What about releasing 2.0.6 anytime soon? I don't see many reasons to wait
>> for more.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> [1] <a href="https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%">https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%
>> 20=%20new%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%20fixVersion%
>> 20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
>> [2] <a href="https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%">https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%
>> 20=%20done%20AND%20project%20=%2012313120%20AND%
>> 20fixVersion%20=%2012341555%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
>>
>>
>


--
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com